Cannabis Enforcement TrackerbyCannabis Freedom IndexCFI ↗
SeizureverifiedCET-16VEC2

Family ties and absent defendants stall Timor-Leste's cannabis case

The first trial hearing in the 13-defendant case was adjourned without a new date because three defendants did not appear and some judges were related to defendants. The defence asked the Superior Council of the Judiciary to decide whether the judge should stay on the panel. The case had already been in court for nearly four years.

🇹🇱 Timor-Leste

The first trial hearing in the 13-defendant case was adjourned without a new date because three defendants did not appear and some judges were related to defendants. The defence asked the Superior Council of the Judiciary to decide whether the judge should stay on the panel. The case had already been in court for nearly four years.[1]

Sources

  1. «Tribunál la konsege julga arguidu na’in-13 ba kazu droga», 5 May 2026. TATOLI. Court report and defence statement.

Where

Layers
  • Urgent
  • At risk
  • Secure
  • Held in a genebank
  • No data yet
  • No seed lot recorded

From Landrace.wiki, CC BY-SA 4.0. Places offset by about 500 m.

Country only

Location accuracy: country only. The sources name no closer place; the dot marks the middle of Timor-Leste.-8.83, 125.85

The law there

All reports from Timor-Leste →

Related reports