Cannabis Enforcement TrackerbyCannabis Freedom IndexCFI ↗
SentenceverifiedCET-8307MA

Nauru's Supreme Court upholds three-month sentences for Indian hemp

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against three-month sentences for possessing Indian hemp under section 10(1)(c) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1968. It was the last reported pre-2004 cannabis prosecution and showed the old law's three-month statutory minimum.

🇳🇷 Nauru

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against three-month sentences for possessing Indian hemp under section 10(1)(c) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1968. It was the last reported pre-2004 cannabis prosecution and showed the old law’s three-month statutory minimum.[1]

Sources

  1. Hubert v Scotty [2004] NRSC 4 (16 February 2004). Nauru Supreme Court. Section 10(1)(c); three-month sentences upheld..

Where

Layers
  • Urgent
  • At risk
  • Secure
  • Held in a genebank
  • No data yet
  • No seed lot recorded

From Landrace.wiki, CC BY-SA 4.0. Places offset by about 500 m.

Country only

Location accuracy: country only. The sources name no closer place; the dot marks the middle of Nauru.-0.52, 166.93

The law there

All reports from Nauru →

Related reports