Mauritius Supreme Court keeps mother of four jailed over 20 kg cannabis cargo
Mauritius's Supreme Court on 21 October 2026 rejected Marie Nathalia Laviolette's judicial review and upheld the Mahébourg court's refusal of bail, keeping the 37-year-old bakery owner in pre-trial detention. She is charged over 20 kg of cannabis brought by sea from Réunion, valued at 24 million rupees, that police say was hidden at Baie-du-Cap.
Mauritius’s Supreme Court on 21 October 2026 rejected a judicial review brought
by Marie Nathalia Laviolette, a 37-year-old bakery owner from L’Escalier, and
kept her in pre-trial detention.[1]The Supreme Court upheld the Mahébourg
court’s refusal to release her on bail on 10 March 2026.[1]
The case began in January 2026 with a cannabis cargo brought by sea from
Réunion, valued at 24 million rupees and hidden in a house at Baie-du-Cap.[1]Police arrested three suspects in that operation on 31 January 2026, among them
Laviolette’s husband Jean Berty David Kardaree.[1]Another man arrested in
mid-February 2026, Terry Toussaint, identified Laviolette by the alias Sorenza
as Kardaree’s wife.[1]
Since 24 February 2026 she has faced two provisional charges: aggravated drug
trafficking over 20 kg of cannabis intended for sale, and inciting Toussaint to
collect the parcel at Baie-du-Cap and bring it to her at Rose-Belle.[1]Her
lawyer, Sanjeev Teeluckdharry, argued that no drug or suspicious money was found
at her home, that she had no criminal record, ran a bakery and was mother to
four minor children.[1]
Judges Iqbal Maghooa and Renuka Devi Dabee found the offences grave and the
risks of flight, reoffending, witness pressure and destruction of evidence too
high, citing the disappearance of the accused’s phone and of the 20 kg of
cannabis.[1]
Case data
Every number and detail the sources state, with the sources that state it.
Charged
1
Cannabis
20 kg
Value (official estimate)
MUR 24,000,000
Agency
Supreme Court of Mauritius
Agency type
Court
Cannabis
Herbal cannabis (20 kg)
Activity
Trafficking, Smuggling
Setting
Home, Port or sea
Charges
aggravated drug trafficking over 20 kg of cannabis intended for sale; inciting a man to collect and deliver the parcel
Case stage
Charged
Region
Port Louis
Route
Réunion → Mauritius
Sources
IONNEWSionnews.muFRTrafic de 20 kg de cannabis : Pas de liberté conditionnelle pour Marie Nathalia Laviolette
Open questions the AI reported
The alleged cargo is valued at 24 million rupees but only 20 kg is stated, and no breakdown of the cargo's weight is given, so the report records 20 kg as stated for the charge.
No source gives the total weight seized or whether the 20 kg was recovered; the judgment notes that the cannabis had disappeared.
The article gives no plea, trial date or outcome beyond the bail ruling, and no ruling text was found.
No independent second account of the 21 October 2026 Supreme Court decision was found; the case details come from this single IONNEWS report.
The exact court in Port Louis is not named beyond the Supreme Court.
Mauritian police have now arrested 18 people over about 1.5 tonnes of cannabis said to have been landed from the Thai yacht Dreamer off Round Island on 20 October 2026. The latest suspect, a port-zone employee held for allegedly driving three shore-pickup men, appeared on a provisional conspiracy charge as investigators named Mauritian-British suspect Nishal as the alleged sender.
ADSU officers arrested three men after finding 691.3 g of cannabis at a Résidence Kennedy home on 19 October 2026. By 22 October, the men had appeared in court on provisional possession and trafficking charges and were remanded in detention.
A Mauritian district magistrate refused on 6 October 2026 to strike out the provisional conspiracy-to-import charge against Gulshan Govind, holding that police had showed a reasonable suspicion over a failed 155.7 kg cannabis shipment from Réunion valued at Rs 234 million. He stayed in custody pending the investigation.
A Mauritian police sergeant arrested over the 62.5 kg cannabis seizure at Plaisance airport was released on bail on 17 July after the Director of Public Prosecutions withdrew its stay. He had been charged with perverting the course of justice, and investigators were still examining his alleged role.