Police in Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh, arrested two young men who were waiting behind the new bus stand with trolley bags to take ganja, the Hindi name for cannabis, to Rajasthan by bus.[1] The search found seven packets of ganja in their bags.[1]
Two Rajasthan men held over seven packets of ganja at Jagdalpur bus stand
Police in Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh, arrested two men from Rajasthan who were waiting behind the new bus stand with trolley bags holding seven packets of ganja, intending to take the load to Rajasthan by bus. The cases were registered under the NDPS Act after the two were produced before the special NDPS court in Jagdalpur.
🇮🇳 New bus stand, Jagdalpur, Bastar district, Chhattisgarh · India
- Arrested
- 2
- Cannabis
- Herbal cannabis
- Case stage
- Charged
Case data
Every number and detail the sources state, with the sources that state it.
- Arrested
- 2
- Agency type
- Police
- Cannabis
- Herbal cannabis
- Activity
- Smuggling
- Setting
- Street or public place
- Case stage
- Charged
- Region
- Chhattisgarh
Sources
- Dainik Bhaskarbhaskar.comHI16.40 लाख के गांजा के साथ 2 तस्कर गिरफ्तार: जगदलपुर से राजस्थान ले जा रहे थे, पुलिस ने मोबाइल और 2100 रुपए भी जब्त किए
Open questions the AI reported
- No weight is recorded: the submitted capture of the article ends at the outlet's paywall before the paragraph giving the consignment's weight, so the kilograms seized are not stated here.
- The headline puts the load's value at about 1.64 million rupees and names two seized mobile phones and 2,100 rupees in cash, but those details are not recorded as structured figures because the body text supporting them was not in the capture.
- The article gives no date for the arrest itself beyond a 7 November court production and publication; 7 November 2026 is used as the incident date.
- The notice above the article dates a tip-off to the evening of 6 November but does not say whether the arrest happened that evening or on 7 November.
- No weight is given for any single packet, so the seven packets cannot be broken down.
- Only one source could be opened; the outlet's own AMP page reproduces the same account and no independent outlet or police statement was found.
- No court outcome, plea or lawyer's comment was reported beyond the production for judicial remand.
